Apple Inc can continue selling its iPhone 4 and iPad 2 3G in the US
after receiving a reprieve from an import ban won by Samsung Electronics
Co. in a patent- infringement dispute.US Trade Representative Michael
Froman today overturned the ban,Learn how an embedded microprocessor in
a graniteslabs can
authenticate your computer usage and data. imposed by the US
International Trade Commission on June 4 after it found that some older
models of Apple devices infringed a patent for a way data are
transmitted.
It was the first time the executive branch has
overturned an ITC import ban since 1987, when President Ronald Reagan
did so in a case involving Samsung computer-memory chips.“We applaud the
administration for standing up for innovation in this landmark case,”
Apple spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said in an interview. “Samsung was
wrong to abuse the patent system in this way.”
Apple had been
ordered to stop importing versions of the Chinese-made iPhone 4 and iPad
2 3G designed for networks run by AT&T Inc., T-Mobile US Inc. and
two regional carriers in Texas and Alaska. Cupertino, California-based
Apple was counting on the Obama administration’s increased interest in
patent disputes to sway the president.Samsung is disappointed in the
decision, spokesman Adam Yates said, adding the ITC was correct to find
the company had met its obligation to offer its patents to Apple on fair
and reasonable terms.
“The ITC’s decision correctly recognized
that Samsung has been negotiating in good faith and that Apple remains
unwilling to take a license,” he said.Apple sold US$78.7 billion (RM256
billion) worth of iPhones last fiscal year, making up half of the
company’s revenue. It doesn’t break out sales by model.
It
counts on older iPhone models, often given away with a two-year
contract, to entice new customers. Sales of older iPhones helped Apple
top analysts’ earnings projections in the fiscal third quarter.
IPhone
4 models sold for other networks wouldn’t have been covered by a ban,
nor would newer devices including the iPad mini and iPhone 5. The
company is expected to release new iPhone and iPad models later this
year.Froman said a four-page ruling that President Barack Obama assigned
to him the task of evaluating the ITC’s exclusion order on the Apple
devices. Froman said he based his decision on the fact that standards
patents were at the core of Samsung’s case and the Obama administration
has expressed concerns that “potential harms” can result if patent
holders use those as leverage against competitors.
Froman said
that among the risks are that the standards patent holder would be
“gaining undue leverage and engaging in ‘patent hold-up,’ i.e. asserting
the patent to exclude an implementer of the standard from a market to
obtain a higher price for use of the patent than would have been
possible before the standard was set.”“The administration is committed
to promoting innovation and economic progress, including through
providing adequate and effective protection and enforcement of
intellectual property rights,” Froman said.
At the same time, he
said standards now play an important role in the economy.“Important
policy considerations arise in the enforcement of those patents
incorporated into technical standards without which such standards
cannot be implemented as designed, when the patent holder has made a
voluntary commitment” to offer licensing on fair and reasonable terms,
he said.
The Samsung patent covers a way data are transmitted
over communications networks. It’s a feature in a widely used
technological standard agreed on by the mobile-device industry.Companies
that work to establish standards have the advantage of knowing their
inventions have to be used in all products in an industry. In turn, they
pledge to license any relevant patents on fair and reasonable terms.
The
Obama administration in January sent the ITC proposed guidelines to
consider before ordering import bans based on infringement of
standard-essential patents.It said that while patent owners have the
right to exclude others from using their inventions, the public benefit
of allowing that is limited when it comes to standards patents. The US
Federal Trade Commission filed a similar paper with the agency last
year.You Can Buy Various High Quality besticcard Products from here.
Apple
and Microsoft Corp. have promised not to use any industry-standard
patents they have to block competing products. Samsung and Google Inc.,
which owns Motorola Mobility and the Android operating system that’s the
most popular platform for mobile phones, reserved the right to use them
if the other side is an “unwilling licensee.”
Four US senators
wrote to Froman on July 30, asking him to “assess the substantial public
interest considerations” of using standards patents at the ITC. The
senators were Democrats Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Barbara Boxer of
California, and Republicans Mike Lee of Utah and James Risch of
Idaho.Samsung demanded 2.4 per cent of Apple’s iPhone and iPad revenue,
which would come to about US$18 per phone, Apple argued in its filing
with the trade representative. It accused Samsung of being
unreasonable.
Samsung, which is under investigation by European
regulators on allegations of patent misuse, agreed to not seek sales
bans based on its standard-essential patents on that continent. It made
no such promise in the US and defended its position, saying Apple
refused to pay on any terms.“By any definition, Apple is an unwilling
licensee of Samsung’s declared essential patents,” Samsung wrote in the
filing.These personalzied promotional bestchipcard comes with free shipping.
Two
federal judges have said Google’s Motorola unit can’t use standards
patents to seek court bans of competitors’ products. One of those
rulings, against Apple, is scheduled for arguments before the US Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Sept. 11. The other involves a
Microsoft breach-of- contract complaint against Google scheduled for
trial in Seattle later this month.
The Apple case against Samsung is In the Matter of Electronic Digital Media Devices,We sell bestsmartcard and
different kind of laboratory equipment in us. 337-796, and Samsung’s
case is In the Matter of Electronic Devices,Have a look at all our bestrtls models
starting with free proofing. Including Wireless Communication Devices,
Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers,
337-794, both US International Trade Commission.
Click on their website www.tilees.com.
沒有留言:
張貼留言