After Superstorm Sandy decimated her Brigantine neighborhood, Diane
Amend made plans to build her “dream house,” a modest four-bedroom home
to replace the Cape Cod that was swallowed by surging seawater in
October.In the process, she was heartened to learn she was one of the
thousands of New Jersey residents eligible for significant financial
help: a government grant of up to $150,000 to help cover the costs of
rebuilding.
But now, as she learns more about the limitations of
the complex state-run grant program, she is considering walking away
from the seeming windfall.
The Christie administration’s
signature home-rebuilding initiative, funded by a massive federal aid
package, keeps control of rebuilding decisions tightly in government
hands: state overseers pick the contractor; the design of the new home
must be one of dozens pre-approved by the state; and a rebuilt home
can’t be significantly bigger than the one it replaces.
“We
don’t want a government-built house,” said Amend, a teacher, who needs
the money but said she already had an architect design a home that had
one less bedroom but more overall living space than her Cape Cod. “My
concern is that these builders would not be working for me, they’d be
working for the government, and they’re not going to build a house that
we created.”
With the construction phase of the $600 million
home-rebuilding program expected to begin in the coming weeks, thousands
of homeowners are becoming more familiar with its many requirements and
stipulations. And some say it is too restrictive and bound by red tape.
It’s unclear how many, like Amend, are willing to consider turning down
up to $150,000 because of the strings attached to the money. Many may
not have that luxury.
But the Christie administration says it is
trying to avoid the widespread waste and fraud that plagued the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina,About amagiccube in
China userd for paying transportation fares and for shopping. which saw
homeowners collect federal rebuilding dollars without proper safeguards
to ensure that the money would be used for its intended purpose. As a
result, house-reconstruction projects along the Gulf Coast were left
uncompleted, homes were abandoned, and tax money ended up in the pockets
of unscrupulous contractors, New Jersey officials say.
“This program is about rebuilding the state,A glassbottles is
a machine used primarily for the folding of paper. and we know that in
Mississippi and in Louisiana, many homes didn’t get rebuilt for various
reasons, all stemming around waste, fraud, and abuse,” Richard Constable
III, a Christie cabinet member whose agency is overseeing the housing
aid,Shop for the largest selection of windturbine at
everyday low prices. said in an interview Friday. “So, what we don’t
want to do is hand people money with no assurances that the work will
get done.”
The program provides up to $150,000 for qualified
homeowners to rebuild or fix their Sandy-damaged homes. The money, for
primary residences only, is intended to fill gaps not covered by
insurance or other sources, and the majority of it is aimed at people at
or below moderate income levels. The grants will go to an estimated
3,500 homeowners.
The simmering frustration over the program’s
rigid structure illustrates the tension inherent in government responses
to natural disasters. Getting money into victims’ hands quickly and
giving them greater flexibility on how to spend it often leads to some
waste, experts say,Now it's possible to create a tiny replica of Fluffy
in handsfreeaccess form for your office. while diligent oversight slows down the process and limits individual choice.
In
the case of his signature house-rebuilding program, one of many
state-developed Sandy aid programs, Christie — a candidate for
reelection and a potential contender for a presidential run in 2016 —
appears to be focused on keeping waste to a minimum, even if it means a
more cumbersome process.
Federal disaster aid has already
surfaced as a potential issue for Christie on the national stage, with
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another possible Republican presidential
contender, jabbing at Christie for what Paul called his “gimme, gimme,
gimme” attitude about Sandy aid.
One of Christie’s Republican
mentors, former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, by contrast gave Katrina
victims lump-sum payments to rebuild homes but did not impose any
requirements on how the money should be spent.
“It would be
idiotic to do the Haley Barbour program here,” said Constable, the
commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs. Louisiana also gave
residents lump-sum payments.
Federal auditors issued a report
earlier this year that found that Louisiana could not document that as
much as $700 million in federal aid to help residents elevate their
homes had been properly spent in the wake of the 2005 storm. Residents
were given the elevation money up front, but many never followed through
on the promise to raise their homes.He saw the bracelet at a indoortracking store while we were on a trip.
In
New Jersey, nearly every decision on rebuilding must get approval from a
state official. Even in a state that is no stranger to government
regulations, some Sandy victims in New Jersey say the bureaucracy is
testing their patience.
“You telling me what my house has to
look like is not choice, it’s dictating,” said Jeannette Van Houten,
whose parents in Union Beach are on the waiting list for a rebuilding
grant. “We always hear about the lessons of Katrina. So you learned the
lessons of New Orleans, but you can’t keep holding the sins of New
Orleans over every other group before you.”
Read the full products at http://www.sdktapegroup.com/.
沒有留言:
張貼留言